Run your SOP inside Cursor
Last updated: October 3, 2026
Some small businesses use Cursor for work that is not code: a spreadsheet, a data file, a script somebody wrote once. The agent is good at the doing and has no idea how your business wants it done.
Handing it the written process closes that gap, and it takes one file.
What can Cursor read?
Cursor reads project rules from a .cursor/rules directory, and an AGENTS.md file at your project root as the simpler alternative. Cursor also reads Agent Skills, the same SKILL.md format Edessa exports, from a .cursor/skills or .agents/skills folder.
Which of the three you use matters less than picking one and keeping it the only copy.
The details move, so check Cursor’s skills docs rather than a blog post. The install steps were checked against the vendor docs on October 3, 2026.
Where does the file go?
- Export the workflow as a Skill.
- Unzip it into your project’s .cursor/skills folder, or into ~/.cursor/skills for every project. Cursor also reads ~/.claude/skills, so a skill already installed for Claude Code shows up here too:
unzip -o ~/Downloads/<skill>.zip -d ~/.cursor/skills/ - If you would rather use plain Markdown, paste the workflow into an AGENTS.md file at the project root. Rule files in .cursor/rules need the .mdc extension and frontmatter, so a plain .md there is ignored.
Three asks worth trying
Once the process is loaded, the useful prompts are not “summarise this.” They are the ones that use the fact that Cursor can now see how your business actually works.
- "Follow this process on these files and show me the diff before you touch anything." Diff-first is the only safe default for an agent acting on real files.
- "Which steps in this process could be one script instead?" Cursor can answer this well because it can see the files the steps operate on.
- "What in this process would break if the input format changed?" The fragile step may not be the obvious one, and it is the one worth writing down.
How do you keep it current?
This is where documentation goes stale. The process changes, the file does not, and six months later the skill is confidently wrong. Keeping it right by hand means editing a Markdown file every time a step changes.
The alternative is re-recording. Do the task once the new way, replace the file with the new export, and the thing your AI tool reads matches what you actually do. That takes about as long as the task does.
The recording method is here, including the manual version if you would rather not use a tool for it.
Related reading
- Scribe alternatives for small businesses
- Edessa vs Scribe
- Scribe pricing explained
- Tango alternatives for small businesses
- Trainual alternatives for small businesses
- Best SOP software for small businesses (2026)
- How to write an SOP from a screen recording
- Run your SOP inside Claude
- Run your SOP inside ChatGPT
- Run your SOP inside GitHub Copilot
- Run your SOP inside Codex
- Run your SOP inside Gemini CLI
- Every comparison, and how the AI SOP generator works.